Categories
Cultural practices, physical methods, resistant varieties, biological control, biopesticides and other low-risk synthetic PPPs.
Registration Tools
Compare available options when a product is highly hazardous or its risks are difficult to manage.

Assessment of alternatives is particularly relevant when a product is, or may be, highly hazardous, or when its risks are difficult or impossible to manage under local conditions of use.
Cultural practices, physical methods, resistant varieties, biological control, biopesticides and other low-risk synthetic PPPs.
Start from the pest problem rather than replacing one product with another, consider all categories and avoid regrettable substitution.
Conduct the analysis with farmers, researchers, extension officers, industry, finance providers and civil society.
Assess current uses, identify priority crops and pests, identify alternatives, compare viable options and develop an implementation plan.
Alternative identification is participatory, but the registration or re-registration decision remains with the national authority under applicable legislation.
Other tools
Select an approach suited to available resources, evidence and the regulatory framework of the target country.
Open section02From pre-registration through review, every step supports a structured assessment of the application.
Open section03Define the studies needed to demonstrate product efficacy and safety through internationally accepted protocols.
Open section04Apply procedures and models suited to each scientific component of the dossier.
Open section05Define effective, practical and communicable measures to reduce health and environmental risks.
Open section06Connect risks, values, alternatives and management measures to reach a regulatory decision.
Open section07Verify that the product meets general protection goals and applicable scientific and legislative criteria.
Open section08Compare available options when a product is highly hazardous or its risks are difficult to manage.
Open section